Biyu masu ilimin tauhidi masu zaman kansu, Fr. Joseph Iannuzzi da Dr. Mark Miravalle, a kwanan nan sun bayyana ra'ayoyinsu mara kyau na Fr. Michel Rodrigue, firist ne mai nagarta, kodayake sahibansa da aka bayyana daga wurin Allah a halin yanzu ba cocin da Church. (Yana da mahimmanci ga Katolika su lura cewa, a cikin kowane yanayi hukuncin da masu ilimin tauhidi ke nema ba daga halattacciyar hukuma ta cocin ba ne, kuma hukunce-hukuncen su ba su da wani nauyi na canonical.) Sanarwar da Dr. Miravalle ya yi a baya - daga inda labarin yake yanzu - jawabi nan ta Daniel O'Connor, da Fr. An gabatar da labarin Iannuzzi na kwanan nan, a bangare, by Christine Watkins anan. A ƙasa zaku sami cikakkiyar amsa da dalili na masanin ilimin tauhidi ɗan Burtaniya, Peter Bannister, MTh, MPhil, ga Fr. Labarin Joseph Iannuzzi mafi kwanan nan.
Mafi yawan labarin shine yankan-da-pasted (a fili wanda mai tambaya, Sharon Freeman na "Gidan Loreto") daga gulma da rabin maganganun karya wanda wani magabacin kashe-kashe-dan adam ne wanda yake zaune a Rome kuma yana da shafin yanar gizo. mai taken, "Daga Rome," wanda, da kanta, na iya yaudarar wasu, saboda shafin ba shi da alaƙa da tsarin Ikilisiyar. Don haka labarin ya ninka wasu tabbatattun abubuwanda galibi ba gaskiya bane tun farko, saboda sun ginu ne bisa zatocin da babu wani bincike game da gaskiya. Ci gaba da yaduwar su, to, ba karamin hatsarin tashin hankali bane.
Fr Iannuzzi ya kammala nasa zargi game da Fr. Michel tare da kalmomin, “Allah baya aiki da wannan hanyar. ” Lallai, babban abin da Fr. Labarin Iannuzzi ya kunshi maimaita ra'ayi cewa, tunda Fr. Bayanin sirri na Michel yana dauke da cikakkun bayanan da ake zargin ba a kiyaye su ba a cikin wasu ayoyin da aka riga aka amince da su, Fr. Wahayin da Michel ya yi dole ne ya zama karya. Abin godiya, Magisterium ya rigaya ya gaya mana yadda ake kallon wannan tunanin:
"Duk da haka ma yakamata ya ƙi wannan kishin wanda yake tunanin cewa duk abin da sabo yakamata to wannan dalilin ya kasance tsayayya ko zargin.”- Mai girma Paparoma Pius XII, Divino Afflante Spiritu. §47
Yanzu muna gayyatarku kuyi la'akari, cikin tsanaki da addu'a, game da mahimmancin binciken Mista Bannister a ƙasa, inda yayi jayayya akan hakan - duk da cewa Fr. Labarin Iannuzzi ya ƙunshi wasu ingantattun wurare da ma abubuwan da suka dace - yanke hukuncin da ya ɗauka daga gare su bashi da hujja kuma a wasu lokuta ana gina su ne akan rashin fahimta. Hankalin Mr. Bannister tabbas zai taimaka wa masu karatu masu neman gaskiya su gane cewa Fr. Michel bai zargi Paparoma Francis da kuskuren koyarwa ba; Fr. Michel bai nuna alamun haƙiƙa na damuwa da hankali ba ko kuma ya kasance maƙaryaci ne wanda ba shi da lafiya (kuma hakan, moreso, rayuwar Fr. Michel da kansa da kuma hidimarsa sun nuna rashin ƙarfin waɗannan zargi); da Fr. Annabce-annabcen Michel ba su da kusa da 'wanda ba a taɓa gani ba' kamar Fr. Iannuzzi ya yi iƙirarin cewa su ne, kuma ba su ƙunshi abubuwan matsalar da Fr. Iannuzzi yayi ikirarin suna yi. Hakanan mahimmanci, Mr. Bannister ya nuna cewa tsarin hanyoyin da Fr. yayi amfani da shi Iannuzzi a cikin yawancin la'antar Fr. Michel yana da rauni ƙwarai kuma bai dace da ƙa'idodin da Ikklisiya ta yarda da su ba na wahayin sirri.
Mr. Bannister shi ma ya yi nuni da hakan, koda kuwa mutum ba zai iya ba kuma ya tabbatar da Fr. Sakon na Michel Rodrigue daga Allah ne, kodayake, mafi yawansu ba su da gaskiya a cikin yarjejeniyar yarjejeniya (watau, wasu sakonni daga masu duba na gaskiya suna fadin abubuwan da Allah ya fada masa).
Idan kun riga kun karanta sukar da Fr. Michel, muna gayyatarku ku karanta wannan amsar (kuma ku lura sosai da shirin Banjister mai zuwa na II, inda zai kara magance batutuwan shirye-shiryen motsa jiki) da sauran wadanda aka sanya a shafin. www.karafarinanebart.com shafin yanar gizon, kuma da addua kuzo ga ra'ayin ku.
***
A cikin rokon bambancewa dangane da mummunan hukuncin da aka yanke game da Fr Michel Rodrigue wanda Farfesa Mark Miravalle da Fr Joseph Iannuzzi suka wallafa kwanan nan, bari na fada tun farko cewa wadannan marubutan biyu sun yi aiki mai matukar mahimmanci game da sufancin Katolika, wanda muke bin su bashi. bashin godiya. Dakatarwar tauhidin tauhidi na rashin gajiya da haƙuri na Dakta Miravalle da bayanin buƙatun neman na Marian Dogma na biyar da aka bayyana a cikin bayyanar Amsterdam zuwa Ida Peerdeman (1945-1959) abin misali ne. Hakanan shima aikin farko na Fr Iannuzzi - wanda aka tabbatar da shi kwanan nan ta hanyar binciken da masanin Faransanci Françoise Breynaert ya gabatar - kan samar da tsarin ilimin addinin kirista wanda zai iya warware tsarin aporia wanda ya kasance cikin mahangar shekaru ta Augustine wanda ya mamaye ilimin tauhidin Yammacin shekaru 1500. Misali na eschatological wanda yake ƙara bayyana kamar yadda yake ba kawai cikin tsananin tashin hankali tare da Littattafai ba amma kuma bai dace da babban yarjejeniya na ingantaccen wahayi na zamani ba. Don mu a matsayin masu ba da gudummawa ga Kidaya zuwa Mulkin, Fr Iannuzzi na binciken kwakwaf ya kasance kuma zai ci gaba da kasancewa albarkatu masu daraja a kokarinmu na ci gaba da fahimtar abubuwan da ake zargi na annabci da ke yaduwa a duk duniya da sakonsa na zamaninmu.
Bugu da kari, Ina so in kara jaddadawa cewa Dr Miravalle da Fr Iannuzzi hakika suna da cikakkiyar dama a cikin bayyana hakikanin abubuwan da suka shafi shakku da damuwar su dangane da batun saukar da wahayi zuwa ga Fr Michel Rodrigue (muddin ana tunatar da cewa wallafe-wallafen nasu wani shiri ne na masu zaman kansu kuma ba sakamakon binciken hukuma na hukuma ba). Abu ne mai ma'ana cewa wahayin wahayi, ko da wanda Cocin ya amince da shi, ba a ɗaure ga masu karatun sa ba, yana ba da umarnin a mafi yawan mutum maimakon bangaskiyar allah. Tabbas, yana da cikakkiyar fahimta cewa yakamata su yi nazarin ƙididdigar ayyukan Fr Michel, gwargwadon yanayin gaskatawarsa da yuwuwar tasirin da yakamata a samo asali daga wahayi na allahntaka.
Rashin sanin Fr Michel Rodrigue da kaina, bani da wata hanyar tabbatar da sahihancin abubuwan da yake ikirarin sun samu. Don haka ba zan iya keɓe cikakkiyar damar cewa asusunsa na iya ƙunsar abubuwa ba na rikicewar hankali ko gurɓatar da gangan. Duk da haka, duk waɗannan damar sun buge ni kamar ba zato ba tsammani, ganin cewa duka yakamata a hankalce da sun haifar da lasarsa a yanzu, ko kuma aƙalla cire shi daga matsayin aiki kamar Rectorhip da ayyukan koyarwa a cikin Studium St Joseph a cikin Diocese na Amos, Quebec. Duk da cewa Bishop na yankin Gilles Lemay ya nesanta kansa sosai daga ayoyin Fr Michel Rodrigue, ba a sake soke yardar diocesan ta Studium St Joseph ba, kuma Apostolic Fraternity na St Benoit-Joseph Labre wanda Fr Michel ya kasance Superior ya kasance a wurin a diocesan yanar gizo, duk da cewa azaman kawai tarayya de facto. Bugu da ƙari, da zurfin bincike a hankali na CD 30 na gabatarwar sauti da yake bayarwa a wurare daban-daban a Arewacin Amurka a cikin 2018 da 2019, da kuma kayan aikin Faransanci na yau da kullun (tambayoyi, gabatarwa), ban ji komai ba da ke nuna cewa Fr Michel Rodrigue ne baya cikin cikakkiyar kwarewar sa, ko kuma shi mai sihiri ne.
Wasu daga cikin batutuwan da aka gabatar a cikin labarin na Fr Iannuzzi tabbas suna da mahimmanci, musamman game da yuwuwar rawar da zamu iya samu na sabawa da al'adun sihiri wanda zai iya (ba da sani ba) ya rinjayi “wahayi” mai gani wanda zai iya zama “gaskiya” akan wasu matakin ba tare da lallai ya zama ɗan wahayi kai tsaye ba a cikin mahimmin ƙarfi. Wannan hakika yana daga cikin mahimman matsaloli wajen kimanta abubuwa kamar yadda ake samu akan wannan rukunin yanar gizon, kuma Fr Iannuzzi ya sami cikakkiyar hujja wajen ƙarfafa wannan matsalar mai yuwuwa game da masu gani gaba ɗaya.
Matsalar ilimin lissafi ta kara tabarbarewa idan yazo da yanayin da ake yawan haduwa dashi wanda wani mai hangen nesa yace yayi maganganu kai tsaye ba tare da tantancewa ko wadannan sun dogara ne da kwarewar sihiri na mutum ba ko kuma mahimmancin ilimin su na rubuce rubucen wasu sufan da suka gabata ko yanzu. Saboda wannan shubuha, manufofinmu shine yunƙurin kimanta kayan masarufi bisa dogaro da abin da suke gabatarwa ba tare da shakku ba kamar wahayi na sama, musamman lokacin da wannan ya ƙunshi abubuwa kamar takamaiman tsinkayen annabci wanda kodai ya faru ko a'a, kamar yadda waɗannan suna da ma'ana tabbatacce. Hakanan ya shafi shaidun tabbatarwa ta hanyar abubuwan mamaki kamar su warkaswa wadanda ba a bayyana su ba a kimiyance, canjin da aka samu a kimiyance a yanayin karfin kwakwalwa yayin wani farin ciki na addini, stigmata, kamewa daga dukkan abinci sai dai Eucharist, lacrimations ko exudations na mai daga mutummutumai ko hotuna, Mu'ujizar eucharistic abubuwan ban mamaki da hasken rana a wuraren da suka fito da dai sauransu. Sabanin haka, labaran sirri irin wadanda Fr Michel Rodrigue ya fada dangane da labarin rayuwarsa da ba a saba gani ba ba za a iya tabbatar da gaskiya ko karya ba: babu wanda aka tilasta ya dauke su da darajar fuska, kuma abin fahimta ne idan an kallesu kamar mutumin, amma tarihin camfi na Kirista yana cike da abubuwan da ba a zata ba, kuma ko abin ya faru ko ba za a iya tantancewa ta hanyar lissafin yuwuwar ba.
Saboda wahalar kimanta shaidar mutum, ya kamata a yarda cewa za a iya gabatar da tambayoyi na halal dangane da Fr Michel Rodrigue wanda a yanzu ba mu da amsoshi a kai. Duk da haka, ana iya musanta abubuwa da yawa ga saƙonni da gabatarwar Fr Michel Rodrigue. Wasu daga cikin waɗannan tuni Christine Watkins da Daniel O'Connor suka yi mu'amala dasu, kuma ina mai duba masu karatu ga amsoshin da aka buga a wannan rukunin yanar gizon, gami da shaidar kwanan nan da wani memba na ofungiyar Apostolic Fraternity ta St Benoit ya ba Christine. -Joseph Labre yana bada shaidar samun waraka daga allah.
A wasu lokuta, tuhumar da ake yiwa Fr Michel zai bayyana ne sakamakon rashin fahimta. Misali a nan shine fassarar Fr Iannuzzi game da kalmomin Fr Michel dangane da zargin "kurakurai" na Paparoma Francis. Babu inda cikin kowane gabatarwarsa ya ba da shawarar cewa Paparoma ya dauki alhakin hakan koyarwar kuskure: abin da ya bayyana yana nufin suna yiwuwa kuskure a cikin makiyaya / aikin gona magance rikice-rikice a cikin Ikilisiya. Ko irin wannan ra'ayi na Paparoma Francis ya yi daidai ko a'a ba shakka batun ra'ayi ne ba, amma ba za a iya cewa bidi'a ce game da fahimtar ilimin tauhidi na Ofishin Petrine ba. Anan, kamar yadda yawancin tsinkayen Fr Michel suke, lokaci ne kawai zai bayyana.
A wasu halaye, rashin fahimtar na iya samun asali ne daga wani sassaucin yare daga bangaren Fr Michel: yayin da ya zama abin fahimta ne cewa wasu su dauki wannan a matsayin gazawa daga bangaren farfesa a makarantar sakandare, zai zama kamar bai cika sadaka ba su watsar da shi a bisa hujjar cewa gabatarwarsa ta baka musamman rashin cikakkiyar ilimin tauhidi. Musamman lokacin da ake isar da su ga masu sauraro marasa ilimi kuma a cikin yare na biyu wanda kalmomin Fr Michel da iya maganarsu ke da iyaka sosai!
A harka shi ne tambayar da dangi a zance ƙarya Paparoma ga maƙiyin Kristi. Anan Fr Iannuzzi hakika daidai ne a ambaton cewa ya fi dacewa da Littattafai da Hadisai don la'akari da maƙiyin Kristi a matsayin ɗan siyasa rashin yarda. Koyaya, akwai kyawawan dalilai don yin la'akari da cewa ofan ofarshen zai sami maƙaryacin Annabi daga cikin masarautan Katolika, kuma babu rashin mahimman bayanai waɗanda suka yi annabcin zuwan Paparoma na karya a cikin wannan mahallin (duba Saverio Gaeta , La Profezia dei saboda Papi, ch. 4). Ridda da cocin Katolika ya yi a matakin da ya fi girma zai zama ita ce kawai hanyar da “ƙazantar lalacewar” ta wakiltar Furotesta na Mass, cire Real Eucharistic Presence kuma ta haka ne “hadaya ta har abada” (cf. Daniel ch. 12), ana iya kawo shi. Irin wannan tsinkayen na iya zama kamar masifa ce, amma sun fito ne da yawa daga tushe (misali Fr. Stefano Gobbi, Sako # 485, 31 ga Disamba, 1992).
A bayyane yake cewa ingantaccen Paparoma, wanda aka kiyaye shi ta hanyar tasirin ma'asumai, ba zai taɓa amincewa da sauye-sauyen koyarwar da Fr Michel da wasu da yawa ke annabta ba. Amma, a bayyane yake daidai cewa haɓakar “Cocin ƙarya” da masu gani da yawa ke magana tun lokacin sanannun wahayi na Anne-Catherine Emmerich na 1820s - Cocin da ke aiki tare da haɗin kai da maƙiyin Kristi - ba batun magana ne kawai na siyasa ba matsin lamba daga ba tare da shi ba, amma sakamakon aikin lesiwararrun lesiwararrun Masana a ciki, wanda Unan tsaran haram ne don sarrafa Al'arshin Bitrus. Zaɓen (mara inganci) na Paparoma na ƙarya shine mafi yuwuwar yiwuwar hankali game da hanyoyin da za'a iya aiwatar da wannan. Don Fr Michel Rodrigue yayi magana game da wannan adadi kamar kasancewar Dujal maimakon Annabin Karya ana iya kushe shi bisa doka a matsayin kasala game da kalmomin tauhidin, amma ra'ayinsa gaba daya ba bako bane ga hadisan annabci.
Wataƙila sananniyar mai hangen nesa da ta ambata musamman kuma a lokatai da yawa zuwa a m Paparoma arya shine Pedro Regis a Anguera, Brazil, wanda sakonninsa da aka karɓa na tsawon shekaru 33 sun sami kulawa sosai kuma sun ji daɗin kulawa da archdiocese (karanta. nan; kuma gani, alal misali, cikakken nazarin Anguera yana son ragione by Annarita Magri wanda yayi ƙoƙarin daidaita annabce-annabce da yawa na Pedro Regis tare da abubuwan da ke faruwa yanzu a cikin Ikilisiya da duniya). Wani kuma shi ne Agustin del Divino Corazon a Kolumbia, wanda ya kirkiro da haɗin gwiwar Ikilisiyar Bautar da arawararru zuwa ga redaukatan Tsarkakku, wanda aka ba da sakon Mariam a cikin fitowar su. Tsammani na Diocese na Lurin:
“Kujerar St Peter zata kasance babu kowa: nan ba da jimawa ba zaka ga Fafaroma biyu kamar na lokacin Avignon: Paparoma na gaskiya da na karya. Kada ku bari kanku ya rikice; kasance a faɗake kuma ku kasance da aminci ga ingantacciyar koyarwa da Al'adar. (Mariya, maestra de los apostoles de los ultimos tiempos, 9 ga Janairu, 2010).
Sauran hamayya ga Fr Michel da Dr. Miravalle da Fr. Iannuzzi a bayyane yake a bayyane don yin tambaya game da daidaitawar ma'amalarsu. Wannan shi ne yanayin musamman lokacin da ake zargin cewa wasu tabbaci na Fr. Michel sanya shi a fili waje na al'ada; yayin da wannan na iya ze prima facie Kasancewa cikin al'amura, kusanci da rubuce-rubucen litattafan asirin Ikklisiya da yawa da aka yarda da su sun nuna cewa abubuwan ba za su iya yankewa ko bushewa ba, kuma yanayin dangane da batun asalin ya fi rikitarwa fiye da yadda ake tsammani da farko kallo.
A falsafa, ilimin tauhidi da kuma tarihi, zato cewa batun da aka bayar na wahayin sirri ana iya yin watsi dashi bisa hujjar cewa "Allah baya yin abubuwa ta wannan hanyar" a bude yake ga tambaya. A ilimin Falsafa, saboda nazarin rubutattun sihiri da ake da shi kawai zai iya haifar da shi fassarar karshe kamar yadda zuwa ga abin da ya faru a da, ba haka ba ne magani wadanda a matsayin abin da iya faruwa a nan gaba. Duk da yake tabbas za'a iya gano wasu alamu masu maimaituwa a cikin rayuwa da rubuce-rubucen ingantattun sihiri waɗanda suka nuna kasancewar "nahawu" na wahayi na sirri (don amfani da lokacin Cardinal Christoph Schönborn), babu wata hujja mai ma'ana don ɗaga waɗannan alamu zuwa matakin ƙauracewa (watau "mai kama da doka") ƙa'idodin gudanar da menene iya faruwa. Tauhidi, bayyanannen koma-baya ne ga kowane a priori sanarwa cewa Allah baya aiki da wani yanayi - wata hujja da ake gani akai-akai dangane da abubuwan da ake zargi na allahntaka kamar su mutum-mutumi na kuka ko hotunan hemographic (jinin) da ke bayyana a jikin masu sihiri - shi ne cewa wannan ya sanya iyakantaccen iyaka ga ikon Allahntaka , wanda shine ma'anar, cikakke. Babu wani dalili da yasa Allah wanda yake yin “Komai sabo” (Ishaya 43:19 / Ru'ya ta Yohanna 21: 5) yakamata a ƙuntata ta hanyar da ta gabata a zaɓar hanyoyin annabci ko kayan kida.
A bangare na 2 na wannan amsa, zan yi kokarin bunkasa wannan batun na karshe dangane da batutuwa da dama inda na yi imanin cewa za a iya nuna hakan, sabanin ra'ayoyin da aka bayyana a labarin Fr Iannuzzi, a can ne Nassoshi a Littãfi da Hadisin ga abin da Fr. Michel ya kasance yana cewa. Wataƙila yawancin matsi shine matsananciyar damuwa game da “ragowa.” Duk da yake dukkanin maɗaukakkun hanyoyin annabci suna tabbatar da cewa babban ma'anar kalmar "mafaka" haƙiƙa ce ta ruhaniya (galibi tana nufin Zukatan Yesu da Maryamu), ganin wannan a matsayin ban da kowane ɓangaren shiri na jiki shine kasa yin la'akari da da yawa kafofin da suke magana game da ayyuka, hakika ba tare da ganin waɗannan a matsayin ɗayan fifiko kan shiri na ruhaniya ba.
A yanzu dai, zan so in karasa da jaddada fifikon ayyukanmu a Kidaya zuwa Mulkin baya tsayawa ko fada akan amincin Fr. Michel Rodrigue, amma a kan mafi yawan yarjejeniya na annabci na duniya wanda, akan shaidar da muke da ita a yanzu, da alama yana da hannu. Wannan yarjejeniya ce ta fi mayar da hankalinmu a kai, ba tambayoyin kowane ɗayan mutane ba.
—Bita Bannister, MTh, MPhil
Alicja Lenczewska
Elizabeth Kindelmann
Ta hanyar abin da ya zama Diary Mai Ruhaniya, Yesu da Maryamu sun koya wa Alisabatu, kuma sun ci gaba da koyar da masu aminci a cikin hanyar allahntaka ta wahala domin ceton rayuka. Ana sanya ɗawainiya don kowace ranar mako, wanda ya ƙunshi salla, azumi, da vigils na dare, tare da kyawawan alkawura da aka haɗu da su, an sanya su tare da yabo na musamman ga firistoci da ruhohi a cikin tsarkakan wuta. A cikin sakonninsu, Yesu da Maryamu sun ce harshen ofauna daga cikin Zuciyar Maryamu babbar kyauta ce da aka bayar ga ɗan adam tun cikin Zaman duniya. Kuma a nan gaba ba mai nisa ba, harshenta zai mamaye duk duniya.
Uba Stefano Gobbi
Me yasa Gisella Cardia?
Abu na uku, saƙonnin suna ta haɗu da kullun tare da abubuwan gani a bayyane, shaidar hoto samu a A cikin garin Cammino con Maria, wanda ba zai iya zama yaudarar hasashen tunanin mutum ba, musamman kasancewar sananniyar jikin jikin Giselle da kuma bayyanar giciye ko rubutu na addini cikin jini a hannun Gisella. Dubi hotunan da aka ɗauka daga gidan yanar gizon ta 
Jennifer
Me yasa Manuela Strack?
Me yasa Masu hangen nesa na Matarmu ta Medjugorje?
Me yasa Pedro Regis?
Me yasa Bawan Allah Luisa Piccarreta?
na tsarkaka. Sai da ta zama "'Yar Maryama" kafin mafarkin mafarkin ya daina yana ɗan shekara goma sha ɗaya. A cikin shekara mai zuwa, Yesu ya fara magana da ita a ciki musamman bayan ya karɓi Sadarwa Mai Tsarki. Lokacin da ta kai shekaru goma sha uku, Ya bayyana gare ta a wahayin da ta halarta daga baranda na gidanta. A can, a titin da ke ƙasa, ta ga taro da sojoji dauke da makamai suna jagorantar fursunoni uku; ta yarda da Yesu a matsayin ɗayansu. Da ya iso ƙasan baranda, sai ya ɗaga kansa sama ya yi ihu:Kurwa, taimake ni! ” Cikin baƙin ciki, Luisa ta ba da kanta daga wannan rana zuwa matsayin wanda aka azabtar don kafara don zunuban 'yan adam.
mara motsi, mai tsattsauran yanayi wanda ya bayyana kusan kamar ta mutu. Sai da wani firist yayi alamar Gicciye a jikinta sannan Luisa ta dawo da ƙwarewarta. Wannan yanayin sihiri na ban mamaki ya ci gaba har zuwa mutuwarta a 1947 - biye da jana'izar da ba ƙaramar matsala ba. A wannan lokacin a rayuwarta, ba ta da wata cuta ta zahiri (har sai da ta kamu da cutar nimoniya a ƙarshen) kuma ba ta taɓa fuskantar gadon gado ba, duk da cewa tana cikin ƙarancin gadonta tsawon shekaru sittin da huɗu.
Me yasa Simona da Angela?
Valeria Copponi